Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.inadded in v11 development - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.inadded in v11 development
Date
Msg-id 20180603082941.GA1820@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.in added in v11 development  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.inadded in v11 development
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 05:20:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>> On 02/06/18 17:09, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> More concerning is that RHEL6 is on 1.0.1e:
>
>> I was only thinking of requiring 1.0.2 on Windows.
>
> Ah.  Personally, I don't care about that case, but maybe somebody
> else wants to speak for it?

That's what I meant as well.  Cutting the minimal OpenSSL version on
Linux would not come I think without complains so the requirements are
way higher.  I know of companies compiling and running benchmarks of
PostgreSQL on past RHEL and SUSE versions, linking to what's locally
available for simplicity.

A script which reports the version of OpenSSL should be simple enough
for MSVC.  And I am ready to bet that at least hamerkop is not using
OpenSSL 1.0.2, so a simple switch would most likely cause the buildfarm
to go red.  I am attaching in CC the maintainers of the Windows animals
so as they can comment.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: New committers announced at PGCon 2018
Next
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?