Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christian Ullrich
Subject Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions
Date
Msg-id 48c18168-005d-70da-37ad-c6406831a278@chrullrich.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions  (Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>)
Responses Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions
List pgsql-hackers
* On 2018-06-12 16:35, Geoff Winkless wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 at 13:41, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>> UNBOUNDED would be terrible. It does not mean the same thing as UNBOUND.
> 
> Indeed. I agree.
> 
>> Perhaps something like NO CHECK would meet the case, i.e. we're not
>> checking the link at function creation time.
> 
> I did wonder about "NO CHECK" but wasn't sure if having two words
> would make the parser change more complex.

DEFERRED?

-- 
Christian



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christian Ullrich
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.inadded in v11 development
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.inadded in v11 development