Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=22E8FA+PNDDtCR_bqdE0zsZZ5yqTfOgoWo_fHZsox2gw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I personally, and I know of a bunch of other regular contributors, find
> context diffs very hard to read.  Besides general dislike, for things
> like regression test output context diffs are just not well suited.
> E.g. in
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2017-04-06%2021%3A10%3A56&stg=check
> the salient point (ERROR:  50 is outside the valid range for parameter "effective_io_concurrency" (0 .. 0))
> is 130 lines into the diff, whereas it's right at the start in a unified diff.
> Issues with one error that causes a lot of followup output changes are
> really common in our regression suite.
>
> I personally have PG_REGRESS_DIFF_OPTS set to -dU10, but that doesn't
> help much analyzing buildfarm output.
>
> Therefore I propose changing the defaults in pg_regress.c.

+1

So much easier to read.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Letting the client choose the protocol to use during aSASL exchange
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?