Re: Very high latency, low bandwidth replication - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stuart Bishop
Subject Re: Very high latency, low bandwidth replication
Date
Msg-id CADmi=6MKThuJtmG0oqXquTMVJoD1xnsczNHyL-L5d3zgnnncRw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Very high latency, low bandwidth replication  (Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Very high latency, low bandwidth replication
List pgsql-general
On 30 June 2014 15:05, Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> wrote:

> What are people's thoughts about a more optimal solution?  I would like to
> use a more incremental approach to replication.  This does not have to be a
> "live" replication .. asynchronously triggering once every 24 hours is
> sufficient.  Also there are only a subset of tables which are required (the
> rest consist of data which is generated).

WAL shipping is probably best here. Configure an archive_command on
the master to  compress and push logs to cloud storage, and configure
a hot standby on site to pull and decompress the logs. The wal-e tool
may make things simpler pushing to cloud storage, or just follow the
PostgreSQL documentation to archive the WAL files to a filesystem.

If that isn't good enough, you can look at more esoteric approaches
(eg. nightly plaintext dumps to a git repository, pushing changes to
disk on site).


--
Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Arup Rakshit
Date:
Subject: Re: How can I replace the year of the created_at column with the current year dynamically ?
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: How can I replace the year of the created_at column with the current year dynamically ?