Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure.
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoBA-2tAq56Gd+RD4XZe2TwaQfDo-u=jjDgScDGDqTitBg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 9:46 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> writes:
> > Looking at dodo's failures, it seems that while it passes
> > module-xid_wraparound-check, all failures happened only during
> > testmodules-install-check-C. Can we check the server logs written
> > during xid_wraparound test in testmodules-install-check-C?
>
> Oooh, that is indeed an interesting observation.  There are enough
> examples now that it's hard to dismiss it as chance, but why would
> the two runs be different?

During the xid_wraparound test in testmodules-install-check-C two
clusters are running at the same time. This fact could make the
xid_wraparound test slower by any chance.

>
> (I agree with the comment that we shouldn't be running this test
> twice, but that's a separate matter.)

+1 not running it twice.

There are test modules that have only TAP tests and are not marked as
NO_INSTALLCHECK, for example test_custom_rmgrs. Probably we don't want
to run these tests twice too?

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Latches vs lwlock contention