On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 2:13 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> It's hard by now (i.e. 17+) because you need substantial amounts of rows to be
> able to trigger it which makes it a hard fight to introduce.
I didn't think that it was particularly hard when I tested the test
that Melanie committed.
> And the cost of
> setting the GUC limit lower is essentially zero.
Apparently you know more about TID Store than me.
If it really is trivial to lower the limit, then I have no objections
to doing so. That would make it easy to fix the test flappiness issues
by just using the much lower limit.
--
Peter Geoghegan
