On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 3:05 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > BTW your patch seems to not apply to the current HEAD cleanly and to
> > need to update the comment of vacuum().
>
> Yeah, I omitted some hunks by being stupid with 'git'.
>
> Since you seem to like the approach, I put back the hunks I intended
> to have there, pulled in one change from your v2 that looked good,
> made one other tweak, and committed this.
Thank you!
> I think I like what I did
> with vacuum_open_relation a bit better than what you did; actually, I
> think it cannot be right to just pass 'params' when the current code
> is passing params->options & ~(VACOPT_VACUUM). My approach avoids
> that particular pitfall.
Agreed. Thanks.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
