On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW your patch seems to not apply to the current HEAD cleanly and to
> need to update the comment of vacuum().
Yeah, I omitted some hunks by being stupid with 'git'.
Since you seem to like the approach, I put back the hunks I intended
to have there, pulled in one change from your v2 that looked good,
made one other tweak, and committed this. I think I like what I did
with vacuum_open_relation a bit better than what you did; actually, I
think it cannot be right to just pass 'params' when the current code
is passing params->options & ~(VACOPT_VACUUM). My approach avoids
that particular pitfall.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
