Re: Rare SSL failures on eelpout - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Rare SSL failures on eelpout
Date
Msg-id 12018.1552956880@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rare SSL failures on eelpout  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> Yeah, now that we understand this properly I agree this is unlikely to
> bother anyone in real life.  I just want to make the build farm green.
> I wondered about ssl_max_protocol_version = 'TLSv1.2', but that GUC's
> too new.

Yeah; also, forcing that would reduce our test coverage.

> Another option would be to change the "command_fails_like"
> pattern to tolerate both errors in v11.

This might be a reasonable stopgap measure, since it'd basically
only affect buildfarm results.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Next
From: "Imai, Yoshikazu"
Date:
Subject: RE: speeding up planning with partitions