Re: [HACKERS] port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [HACKERS] port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzqHKOwwR86ov0q=JT-x8=GkFGXNf+gXUT6fRt1vnULmA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2/28/17 08:57, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>     It appears we need pandoc 1.13 to get the good output.  This won't be
>     available until Debian stretch.
>
>     So for PG10, I propose the attached revised patch which keeps using lynx
>     but uses xsltproc instead of jade.
>
>
> It is available for people not using debian though? Might it be
> worthwhile to make it dependent on the version of pandoc -- so use that
> method if people have the newer pandoc and fall back to lynx if they don't?

Well, this really only runs once every couple of months on borka and
here or there for those building their own snapshot tarballs.  I don't
think we need to cater to a wide audience here.  In fact, variety could
be bad here:  We don't want to find out that a tarball was rolled with
the wrong variant.

Good point. Let 's just go for it then.


--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0