Re: [HACKERS] port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT
Date
Msg-id cf3bbc3e-3367-ae59-093b-5bbe0dc3b78b@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/1/17 20:23, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com
> <mailto:peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 2/28/17 08:57, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>     >     It appears we need pandoc 1.13 to get the good output.  This won't be
>     >     available until Debian stretch.
>     >
>     >     So for PG10, I propose the attached revised patch which keeps using lynx
>     >     but uses xsltproc instead of jade.
>     >
>     >
>     > It is available for people not using debian though? Might it be
>     > worthwhile to make it dependent on the version of pandoc -- so use that
>     > method if people have the newer pandoc and fall back to lynx if they don't?
> 
>     Well, this really only runs once every couple of months on borka and
>     here or there for those building their own snapshot tarballs.  I don't
>     think we need to cater to a wide audience here.  In fact, variety could
>     be bad here:  We don't want to find out that a tarball was rolled with
>     the wrong variant.
> 
> 
> Good point. Let 's just go for it then.

Committed that way.  Thanks.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hash support for grouping sets
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan