Re: [Patch] change the default value of shared_buffers in postgresql.conf.sample - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [Patch] change the default value of shared_buffers in postgresql.conf.sample
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzcDuZVqvXB_V3a3=XsCZCR8apn+MVSqAPjZ1rr+q_B9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Patch] change the default value of shared_buffers in postgresql.conf.sample  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [Patch] change the default value of shared_buffers in postgresql.conf.sample  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:16 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > I think the only question is whether this is a PG 15-only patch or a
> > > patckpatch to PG 10;  I am in favor of the later.
> >
> > I think you need a lot stronger argument that this is a bug
> > before you consider back-patching user-visible behavioral
> > changes.
>
> I think the only logic to backpatching it is your statement that this is
> cosmetic, and the new cosmetic appearance is more accurate.  However, if
> you don't feel we need to backpatch, that is fine with me --- we have
> gotten very few complaints about this.

+1 for making the change ,and +1 for making it in master only, no backpatch.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Improve CPU cache locality of syscache searches
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: strange case of "if ((a & b))"