Re: [Patch] change the default value of shared_buffers in postgresql.conf.sample - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [Patch] change the default value of shared_buffers in postgresql.conf.sample
Date
Msg-id 20210823163352.GA30537@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Patch] change the default value of shared_buffers in postgresql.conf.sample  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 08:27:19PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:16 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > > I think the only question is whether this is a PG 15-only patch or a
> > > > patckpatch to PG 10;  I am in favor of the later.
> > >
> > > I think you need a lot stronger argument that this is a bug
> > > before you consider back-patching user-visible behavioral
> > > changes.
> >
> > I think the only logic to backpatching it is your statement that this is
> > cosmetic, and the new cosmetic appearance is more accurate.  However, if
> > you don't feel we need to backpatch, that is fine with me --- we have
> > gotten very few complaints about this.
> 
> +1 for making the change ,and +1 for making it in master only, no backpatch.

Patch applied to master.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org"
Date:
Subject: Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: pretty slow merge-join due rescan?