On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 5:40 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:01:02AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Yeah, my mind was considering as well yesterday the addition of a note > in the docs about something among these lines, so fine by me.
And applied that, after tweaking a few tiny things on a last lookup with a catversion bump. Note that the example has been moved at the bottom of the table for these functions, which is more consistent with the surroundings.
Hi!
Caught this thread late. To me, pg_dissect_walfile_name() is a really strange name for a function. Grepping our I code I see the term dissect s used somewhere inside the regex code and exactly zero instances elsewhere. Which is why I definitely didn't recognize the term...
Wouldn't something like pg_split_walfile_name() be a lot more consistent with the rest of our names?
