Re: Draft release notes complete - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Draft release notes complete
Date
Msg-id CABUevEyc5q+7GPrdoshQmh8VjiBj=EERR4Ws7cUAACa+zx844g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Draft release notes complete  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Draft release notes complete
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> On 09/05/2012 06:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>> On 8/29/12 11:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why does this need to be tied into the build farm?  Someone can surely
>>>>
>>>> set up a script that just runs the docs build at every check-in, like it
>>>> used to work.  What's being proposed now just sounds like a lot of
>>>> complication for little or no actual gain -- net loss in fact.
>>>
>>> It doesn't just build the docs. It makes the dist snapshots too.
>>
>> Thus making the turnaround time on a docs build even slower ... ?
>
>
>
> A complete run of this process takes less than 15 minutes. And as I have
> pointed out elsewhere that could be reduced substantially by skipping
> certain steps. It's as simple as changing the command line in the crontab
> entry.

Is it possible to run it only when the *docs* have changed, and not
when it's just a code-commit? meaning, is the detection smart enough
for that?


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue observed in cascade standby setup and analysis for same