On 2018/12/04 11:23, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:51:40AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> Okay, here is a patch. I didn't find any tests in subscription.sql >> related to unsupported relkinds, so didn't bother adding one for this case >> either. > > Should we care about other relkinds as well?
Maybe, foreign tables? I'd think that code wouldn't care about explictly handling indexes, view, sequences, toast tables, etc.
I think more people would directly understand the "is not a table" for a foreign table than a partitioned one (for example, it does now show up in \dt or under tables in pgadmin, but partitioned ones do). That said, if it's not too complicated, I think including foreign tables as well would definitely be useful, because it has table in the name. For the other types, I agree they don't need to be special-cased, they are fine the way they are.
