On 2018/12/04 11:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:51:40AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> Okay, here is a patch. I didn't find any tests in subscription.sql
>> related to unsupported relkinds, so didn't bother adding one for this case
>> either.
>
> Should we care about other relkinds as well?
Maybe, foreign tables? I'd think that code wouldn't care about explictly
handling indexes, view, sequences, toast tables, etc.
Thanks,
Amit
