On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 8:20 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:27 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
> > On 7/15/21 12:26 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:47 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > >> Yeah, that seems pretty horrid. I still don't like the way the
> > >> array casts were done, but I'd be okay with pushing the unnest
> > >> addition.
> > >
> > > +1 for just unnest().
> >
> > ...which was my original ask at the beginning of the thread :) So +1.
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I've pushed the unnest() patch to master and
> pg14. I've initially forgotten to change catversion.h for master, so
> I made it with an additional commit.
>
> I've double-checked that "make check-world" passes on my machine for
> both master and pg14. And I'm keeping my fingers crossed looking at
> buildfarm.
This patch was closed with "moved to next commitfest" in the July
commitfest, and is currently sitting as "Needs review" in the
September one.
If it's committed, it should probably have been closed with that? And
if there are things still needed, they should perhaps have their own
CF entry instead since we clearly do have unnest() for multiranges?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
