Re: Advantages page out of date - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Advantages page out of date
Date
Msg-id CABUevEwG4EkzCycAAOuciVUtyibaYnJKK0W0w1HrXjX9JT+CRw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Advantages page out of date  (Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-www
On Saturday, May 19, 2012, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
On 5/18/12, Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> No question.  It's not remotely the only page which is horribly out of date,
> either.
>
> Think you could write up replacement text for the page?

Sure. A quick fix (patch: advantages_quickfix.diff) would be to remove
just that line, and leave Hot stand-by covered by the entry for
'Replication'.

I think a better solution (patch: advantages_link_matrix.diff) would
be to simply link the user to the Feature Matrix, instead of trying to
summarize some arbitrary subset of those features under Technical
Features.

I think this is definitely the best idea for now, so I've applied this version of the patch.
 

If we did want to keep something like the Technical Features section
around, I think its scope should be narrowed down to features which
are rare, nonexistent, or limited in our competitors. Support for
Unicode, sub-selects, views, etc. may have been cutting-edge features
back when that page was written, but is not such a draw these days.
Things like SP-GiST, KNN, per-transaction durability control, SSI,
SE-Postgres, transactional DDL, JSON and Range types, etc. along with
a summary of why they're better than our competitor implementations
would make for an interesting read IMO. But this kind of prose seems
like it'd be better suited for the wiki anyway... there's not already
a page like that, other than the comparisons against MySQL, is there?
I'd be happy to help start a page like that.

Yeah, I think that might be better suited on the wiki. At least, that's a good place to start.

Perhaps a future development could be a version of the feature matrix that instead of having postgresql versions on the "x axis", it would instead have typical competitors.

Could be combined with the rumored feature I was once working on that would let you dynamically pick which columns would show up in the feature matrix, to customize your own comparisons between the versions you are actually interested in :)




--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: HEADSUP - {www,ftp}.postgresql.org IPv6 enabled
Next
From: Marti Raudsepp
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Cross-version navigation in documentation