Re: Bad sorting on source - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Bad sorting on source
Date
Msg-id CABUevEwC+aADdvX7k8fm283M+_1bteOcnOP4kmFAjmPNUXwM5A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad sorting on source  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: Bad sorting on source
List pgsql-www
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Jonathan S. Katz
<jonathan.katz@excoventures.com> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Robert Treat wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Jonathan S. Katz
>> <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com> wrote:
>>> On Mar 4, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Robert Treat wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 02/28/2014 03:09 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Damn, I was actually half-way towards a solution, though it was taking
>>>>>> a bit longer than anticipated as I was learning Python as I was going
>>>>>> along.
>>>>>> (btw until now I had absolutely no idea that the Pg website is
>>>>>> Python/Django
>>>>>> based). Still, now I a) know some Python and b) have some idea of how to
>>>>>> work with the website code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway thanks for that, looks good :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh... I am sure we can find something else for you to do :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do we have a TODO list for the website?
>>>
>>> Not publicly AFAIK - there are a handful of items in redmine.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, I looked in redmine, but I only see pgadmin stuff; permissions
>> issue? or maybe wrong url?
>
> Looks like access - Magnus, Dave or Stefan can fix.

Done.

Oh, and FYI, the reason it's closed I believe that it's sometimes used for information about security issues, either in postgres or in the website itself. It's not to intentionally exclude people. So if we wanted an actual TODO list for it, sticking one of those on the wiki might be a good idea.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad sorting on source
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad sorting on source