Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date
Msg-id CABOikdOOJ07E-Ne=DjS4mb902NFaDORHpFrwOby7Efc+Bi11rA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Tom,

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

(I'm a little more concerned by Alvaro's apparent position that WARM
is a done deal; I didn't think so.  

Are there any specific aspects of the design that you're not comfortable with? I'm sure there could be some rough edges in the implementation that I'm hoping will get handled during the further review process. But if there are some obvious things I'm overlooking please let me know.

Probably the same question to Andres/Robert who has flagged concerns. On my side, I've run some very long tests with data validation and haven't found any new issues with the most recent patches.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
 Pavan Deolasee                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?