Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdv0EaWWF=zbd7QpxogNDMX2sU4VYYEqyy2hy6gSFt_Q=g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2017-02-21 16:57:36 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Yes, there is still some regression however it has come down by a
> small margin. I am not doing initdb for each run instead I am doing,
> dropdb-->createdb-->pgbench -i. Is dropping old database and creating
> a new one for every run not okay, Do I have to do initdb every time.
> Okay, I can change the order of reading and let you know the results.

That does make a difference. Primarily because WAL writes in a new
cluster are a more expensive than in an old one, because of segment
recycling.

+1

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines