2022年12月20日(火) 21:35 Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>:
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:27 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 5:40 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:01:02AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> > Yeah, my mind was considering as well yesterday the addition of a note
> >> > in the docs about something among these lines, so fine by me.
> >>
> >> And applied that, after tweaking a few tiny things on a last lookup
> >> with a catversion bump. Note that the example has been moved at the
> >> bottom of the table for these functions, which is more consistent with
> >> the surroundings.
> >>
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Caught this thread late. To me, pg_dissect_walfile_name() is a really strange name for a function. Grepping our I
codeI see the term dissect s used somewhere inside the regex code and exactly zero instances elsewhere. Which is why I
definitelydidn't recognize the term...
Late to the party too, but I did wonder about the name when I saw it.
> > Wouldn't something like pg_split_walfile_name() be a lot more consistent with the rest of our names?
>
> Hm. FWIW, here's the patch.
Hmm, "pg_split_walfile_name()" sounds like it would return three 8
character strings.
Maybe something like "pg_walfile_name_elements()" ?
Regards
Ian Barwick
