Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTr3YPDJ4fCjc5VB-g3rC3JqtjB+hWfeP9DFfK-ZXj9Fg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
>>> Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>> Meh. I forgot docs and --help output updates.
>>>
>>> Looks good, except that you left the "N" option in the getopt_long
>>> call for pg_dumpall.  I fixed that in the attached patch.
>>
>> No, v5 has removed it, but it does not matter much now...
>>
>>> I'll mark the patch "ready for committer".
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Moved to CF 2017-01.

Moved to CF 2017-03 with the same status, ready for committer. Perhaps
there is some interest in this feature? v5 of the patch still applies,
with a couple of hunks, so v6 is attached.
-- 
Michael

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix a comment in feelist.c