Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSS=z35w9BHbOKGszZYFkoUJWRAY_4ynbBWc=ud+Hrh3w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
>> Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Meh. I forgot docs and --help output updates.
>>
>> Looks good, except that you left the "N" option in the getopt_long
>> call for pg_dumpall.  I fixed that in the attached patch.
>
> No, v5 has removed it, but it does not matter much now...
>
>> I'll mark the patch "ready for committer".
>
> Thanks!

Moved to CF 2017-01.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)", File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL consistency check facility