Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRjhAg4HxX-NhCNv9b16Uhx1pxxzNwU=q2RLSOZK6Heuw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Responses Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Meh. I forgot docs and --help output updates.
>
> Looks good, except that you left the "N" option in the getopt_long
> call for pg_dumpall.  I fixed that in the attached patch.

No, v5 has removed it, but it does not matter much now...

> I'll mark the patch "ready for committer".

Thanks!
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Albe Laurenz
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress