Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTSbv6t9_C-wEtVjvmw_LppK=+i7p-iaPK1MXoTJhTzDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> Test2:
> pgbench -i -s 300 postgres
> pgbench -c$ -j$ -Mprepared -S postgres
>
> Client             Base                      Pached
>
> 1                      20555                    19404
> 32                  375919                  332670
> 64                  509067                  440680
> 128                431346                  415121
> 256                380926                  379176
>
> Test3:
> pgbench -i -s 100 postgres
> pgbench -c$ -j$ -Mprepared -S postgres
>
> Client             Base                      Pached
>
> 1                      20555                    19404
> 32                  375919                  332670
> 64                  509067                  440680
> 128                431346                  415121
> 256                380926                  379176

It seems like you did a copy-paste of the results with s=100 and
s=300. Both are showing the exact same numbers.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY (... tab completion
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing