Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.10.1601191301350.15654@sto
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: checkpointer continuous flushing  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
List pgsql-hackers
> synchronous_commit = off does make a significant difference.

Sure, but I had thought about that and kept this one...

I think I found one possible culprit: I automatically wrote 300 seconds 
for checkpoint_timeout, instead of 30 seconds in your settings. I'll have 
to rerun the tests with this (unreasonnable) figure to check whether I 
really get a regression.

Other tests I ran with "reasonnable" settings on a large (scale=800) db 
did not show any significant performance regression, up to know.

-- 
Fabien.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes