On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>
>> FWIW, adding an <> operator for xid seems like a perfectly good idea.
+1. I have wanted that more than once, but avoided it all the time
with some casts.
> +1 (two of them actually --
See for example the attached (do we care about commutativity with int
= xid and int <> xid?).
> (another one for <>(xid,int) which mirrors the =(xid,int) we already have).
To which one are you referring here?
--
Michael
