-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 23/10/2015 14:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Andres Freund wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW, adding an <> operator for xid seems like a perfectly good
>>> idea.
>
> +1. I have wanted that more than once, but avoided it all the time
> with some casts.
>
>> +1 (two of them actually --
>
> See for example the attached
I just reviewed the patch, tests passed and feature works as intended.
I change the status to ready for committer.
> (do we care about commutativity with int = xid and int <> xid?).
>
>> (another one for <>(xid,int) which mirrors the =(xid,int) we
>> already have).
>
> To which one are you referring here?
>
>
>
>
- --
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWPeWGAAoJELGaJ8vfEpOqxtQIAIH5v1aNlcH/vvPgdZ9YTx3q
ZzyUfjtzn4mtqHNaTy9Nmob3N0EzeP6U+veVG5gkFJhBT/Dj0xSJn9QNMYTcXimX
RYpNJFlp0MF8b3xC10Oyz5fWcMmeBJYi7/CzHWUa3GLyT27qeDqJmv+npVgadPUC
WKMdBNQP4X5tdN3SfPlmIIfrAmkZFpJukcmor01rATBZckPV/7jHvNK34MQcpvgP
0LwpsomPbe1FKTMVafatRhDYczMptqSxpaCbay9+E6LqANiEmV82aANnnqFO7UcV
XdVSQSC0e5YXjcOj+4NRDsaY28CfqtUCzyXd76X1CRnhgEbLsoPSHyg9RBnennE=
=6JDx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
