Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRT3dqctXcFmXvcZaoL8M6R-CaTg3QSodr1U+tmbdoyCA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I'm only talking about the actual value in pg_stat_replication here, not
> what we are using internally. These are two different things of course -
> let's keep them separate for now. In pg_stat_replication, we explicitly
> check for InvalidXLogRecPtr and then explicitly set the resulting value to
> NULL in the SQL return.

No objections from here. I guess you already have a patch?
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: YUriy Zhuravlev
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Some questions about the array.