Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups
Date
Msg-id CABUevEy7roL3RD=OVP1fX+4vnKWRWh8=ibz4kodumn=ndhTqdA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I'm only talking about the actual value in pg_stat_replication here, not
> what we are using internally. These are two different things of course -
> let's keep them separate for now. In pg_stat_replication, we explicitly
> check for InvalidXLogRecPtr and then explicitly set the resulting value to
> NULL in the SQL return.

No objections from here. I guess you already have a patch?

Well, no, because I haven't figured out which way is the logical one - make them all return NULL or make them all return 0/0... 


--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
Next
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2