On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> This is really a pretty small patch all things considered, and pretty
> low-risk (although I haven;t been threough the code in fine detail yet).
> In the end I'm persuaded by Andres' point that there's actually no
> practical alternative way to make sure the data is actually synced to disk.
>
> If nobody else wants to pick it up I will, unless there is a strong
> objection.
Thanks!
--
Michael
