On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> This is really a pretty small patch all things considered, and pretty
>> low-risk (although I haven;t been threough the code in fine detail yet).
>> In the end I'm persuaded by Andres' point that there's actually no
>> practical alternative way to make sure the data is actually synced to disk.
>>
>> If nobody else wants to pick it up I will, unless there is a strong
>> objection.
>
> Thanks!
Thanks Andrew, I can see that this has been committed as 96a7128b.
I also saw that:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/75e1b6ff-c3d5-9a26-e38b-3cb22a099ff0@2ndQuadrant.com
I'll send a patch in a bit for the regression tests.
--
Michael
