Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=0QoRJNjnrLfAyTpQ4OyY3uKqXdNhO7-mYOvsb+6Dbffg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)  (Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>> I disagree with that. It is a
>> trade-off, I suppose. I have now run out of time to work through it
>> with you or Thomas, though.
>
> Bummer.

I'm going to experiment with refactoring the v10 parallel CREATE INDEX
patch to use the SharedBufFileSet interface from
hj-shared-buf-file-v8.patch today and see what problems I run into.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication apply to run with sync commit off by default
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability