On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:01 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
It is rather a pain to pass down custom options to isolationtester. For example, I have tested the updated version attached after hijacking -n into isolation_start_test(). Ugly hack, but for testing that's enough. Do you make use of this tool in a particular way in greenplum? Just wondering.
(Could it make sense to have long options for isolationtester by the way?)
In Greenplum, we mainly add new tests to a separate isolation framework (called isolation2) which uses a completely different syntax. It doesn't use isolationtester at all. So, I haven't had a use case to add long options to isolationtester yet :)
