Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps
Date
Msg-id 20190821191643.GA22373@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps  (Asim R P <apraveen@pivotal.io>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Aug-21, Melanie Plageman wrote:

> In Greenplum, we mainly add new tests to a separate isolation
> framework (called isolation2) which uses a completely different
> syntax. It doesn't use isolationtester at all. So, I haven't had a use
> case to add long options to isolationtester yet :)

Is that other framework somehow more capable?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Removing pg_pltemplate and creating "trustable" extensions