On August 21, 2019 8:36:34 AM PDT, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> We treat LWLockAcquire() as a no-fail operation in many
>places; in my opinion, that elog(ERROR) that we have for too many
>LWLocks should be changed to elog(PANIC) precisely because we do treat
>LWLockAcquire() as no-fail in lots of places in the code, but I think
>I suggested that once and got slapped down, and I haven't had the
>energy to fight about it.
Fwiw, that proposal has my vote.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
