On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:21 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:20 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:11 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > v5-0001, incorporates all the comment fixes suggested by Alvaro. and
> > 0001 is an additional patch which moves
> > MarkCurrentTransactionIdLoggedIfAny(), out of the critical section.
> >
>
> Thanks, both your patches look good to me except that we need to
> remove the sentence related to the revert of ade24dab97 from the
> commit message. I think we should backpatch the first patch to 14
> where it was introduced and commit the second patch (related to moving
> code out of critical section) only to HEAD but we can even backpatch
> the second one till 9.6 for the sake of consistency. What do you guys
> think?
>
The other option could be to just commit both these patches in HEAD as
there is no correctness issue here.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
