On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 9:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:21 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:20 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:11 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > v5-0001, incorporates all the comment fixes suggested by Alvaro. and
> > > 0001 is an additional patch which moves
> > > MarkCurrentTransactionIdLoggedIfAny(), out of the critical section.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks, both your patches look good to me except that we need to
> > remove the sentence related to the revert of ade24dab97 from the
> > commit message. I think we should backpatch the first patch to 14
> > where it was introduced and commit the second patch (related to moving
> > code out of critical section) only to HEAD but we can even backpatch
> > the second one till 9.6 for the sake of consistency. What do you guys
> > think?
> >
>
> The other option could be to just commit both these patches in HEAD as
> there is no correctness issue here.
Right, even I feel we should just commit it to the HEAD as there is no
correctness issue.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
