On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:59 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> po 18. 11. 2019 v 6:24 odesílatel Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> napsal:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:33 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > po 18. 11. 2019 v 4:43 odesílatel vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> napsal:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I had seen that isolation test(src/test/isolation) has a framework to
>> >> support this. You can have a look to see if it can be handled using
>> >> that.
>> >
>> >
>> > I'll look there
>> >
>>
>> If we want to have a test for this, then you might want to look at
>> test src/test/recovery/t/013_crash_restart. In that test, we keep a
>> connection open and then validate whether it is terminated. Having
>> said that, I think it might be better to add this as a separate test
>> patch apart from main patch because it is a bit of a timing-dependent
>> test and might fail on some slow machines. We can always revert this
>> if it turns out to be an unstable test.
>
>
> +1
>
So, are you planning to give it a try? I think even if we want to
commit this separately, it is better to have a test for this before we
commit.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
