Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KT3BYj50qWhK5qBF=LDzQCoUVSFZjcK3mHoJJeWA+fNA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks.  I think now we can proceed with
>> fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix
>> the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash
>> nodes.
>
> Committed and back-patched to v10.
>

Thanks and attached find the rebased version that can be applied to
v9.6.  I have to change the test case to produce a stable output and
the reason for the change is that 9.6 doesn't have 'summary off'
option for Explain.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Next
From: Huong Dangminh
Date:
Subject: RE: User defined data types in Logical Replication