Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaG06D3tGUC+Xq_tjfTa6ZkTBL_yBq8tystTWYxWZjmGg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks.  I think now we can proceed with
>>> fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix
>>> the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash
>>> nodes.
>>
>> Committed and back-patched to v10.
>
> Thanks and attached find the rebased version that can be applied to
> v9.6.  I have to change the test case to produce a stable output and
> the reason for the change is that 9.6 doesn't have 'summary off'
> option for Explain.

This thread got lost in my inbox over Christmas, but I've now
committed this back-port to REL9_6_STABLE.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Next
From: Maksim Milyutin
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wrong t_bits alignment in pageinspect