On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 4:48 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Friday, December 2, 2022 4:59 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> > ~~~
> >
> > 12. pa_clean_subtrans
> >
> > +/* Reset the list that maintains subtransactions. */ void
> > +pa_clean_subtrans(void)
> > +{
> > + subxactlist = NIL;
> > +}
> >
> > Maybe a more informative function name would be pa_reset_subxactlist()?
>
> I thought the current name is more consistent with pa_start_subtrans.
>
Then how about changing the name to pg_reset_subtrans()?
>
> >
> > 21. apply_worker_clean_exit
> >
> > I wasn't sure if calling this a 'clean' exit meant anything much.
> >
> > How about:
> > - apply_worker_proc_exit, or
> > - apply_worker_exit
>
> I thought the clean means the exit number is 0(proc_exit(0)) and is
> not due to any ERROR, I am not sure If proc_exit or exit is better.
>
> I have addressed other comments in the new version patch.
>
+1 for apply_worker_exit.
One minor suggestion for a recent change in v56-0001*:
/*
- * A hash table used to cache streaming transactions being applied and the
- * parallel application workers required to apply transactions.
+ * A hash table used to cache the state of streaming transactions being
+ * applied by the parallel apply workers.
*/
static HTAB *ParallelApplyTxnHash = NULL;
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
