Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+_=Va=OjDYkm4rYiY+J_YK3H=0YXDW1MWRh6_ts0Nucw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > a. How about describing w.r.t asynchronous connections
> >> > instead of parallel connections?
> >>
> >> I don't think "asynchronous" is a good choice of word.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> >>Maybe "simultaneous"?
> >
> > Not sure. How about *concurrent* or *multiple*?
>
> multiple isn't right, but we could say concurrent.

I also find concurrent more appropriate.
Dilip, could you please change it to concurrent in doc updates,
variables, functions unless you see any objection for the same.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sawada Masahiko
Date:
Subject: Re: add line number as prompt option to psql
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Compute attr_needed for child relations (was Re: inherit support for foreign tables)