Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip kumar
Subject Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Date
Msg-id 4205E661176A124FAF891E0A6BA913526634C47A@szxeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 21 August 2014 08:31, Amit Kapila Wrote,

 

> >>
> > >Not sure. How about *concurrent* or *multiple*?
> >
> >multiple isn't right, but we could say concurrent.

>I also find concurrent more appropriate.

>Dilip, could you please change it to concurrent in doc updates,

>variables, functions unless you see any objection for the same.

 

Ok, I will take care along with other comments fix..

 

Regards,

Dilip Kumar

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Parallel Sequence Scan doubts
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_xlogdump --stats