Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobQe1UkpDT74cYD-0xs7gtjuXQYUcsXakXmvSSf2soxqA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > 1.
>> > +        Number of parallel connections to perform the operation. This
>> > option will enable the vacuum
>> > +        operation to run on parallel connections, at a time one table
>> > will
>> > be operated on one connection.
>> >
>> > a. How about describing w.r.t asynchronous connections
>> > instead of parallel connections?
>>
>> I don't think "asynchronous" is a good choice of word.
>
> Agreed.
>
>>Maybe "simultaneous"?
>
> Not sure. How about *concurrent* or *multiple*?

multiple isn't right, but we could say concurrent.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.5: Memory-bounded HashAgg
Next
From: "Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL