On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas <
robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Amit Kapila <
amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 1.
> > + Number of parallel connections to perform the operation. This
> > option will enable the vacuum
> > + operation to run on parallel connections, at a time one table will
> > be operated on one connection.
> >
> > a. How about describing w.r.t asynchronous connections
> > instead of parallel connections?
>
> I don't think "asynchronous" is a good choice of word.
Agreed.
>Maybe "simultaneous"?
Not sure. How about *concurrent* or *multiple*?
