Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date
Msg-id CA+q6zcV3bzfSRfWu4pFich46evryijX3ELFV_zm=kPg7KALaOQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 6:46 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:22 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> Rebase after pg_indent. Besides, off the list there was a suggestion that this
> > > > >> could be useful to accept more than one data type as a key for subscripting.
> > > > >> E.g. for jsonb it probably makes sense to understand both a simple key name and
> > > > >> jsonpath:
> > >
> > > And one more rebase.
> >
> > Oh, looks like I was just confused and it wasn't necessary - for some reason
> > starting from v22 cfbot tries to apply v6 instead of the latest one.
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Sorry about that.  It looks like I broke the cfbot code that picks
> which thread to pull patches from when there are several registered in
> the CF app, the last time the HTML format changed.  Now it's back to
> picking whichever thread has the most recent message on it.  Such are
> the joys of web scraping (obviously we need better integration and
> that will happen, I just haven't had time yet).
>
> Anyway, I fixed that.  But now you really do need to rebase :-)

Thanks for fixing and for the reminder! Here is the new rebased version. It
contradicts a bit with 44982e7d09, because I'm actually using indexprSlice, but
I guess we can figure this out.

And I must admit, it's a pure fun to maintain such a large patch set in sync
for already several years :)

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch] Mingw: Fix import library extension, build actual staticlibraries