Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKj6sSu7+a_u4S7uHV_4aFiN5Es+mz1jn0nYFZErX71qA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:22 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> Rebase after pg_indent. Besides, off the list there was a suggestion that this
> > > >> could be useful to accept more than one data type as a key for subscripting.
> > > >> E.g. for jsonb it probably makes sense to understand both a simple key name and
> > > >> jsonpath:
> >
> > And one more rebase.
>
> Oh, looks like I was just confused and it wasn't necessary - for some reason
> starting from v22 cfbot tries to apply v6 instead of the latest one.

Hi Dmitry,

Sorry about that.  It looks like I broke the cfbot code that picks
which thread to pull patches from when there are several registered in
the CF app, the last time the HTML format changed.  Now it's back to
picking whichever thread has the most recent message on it.  Such are
the joys of web scraping (obviously we need better integration and
that will happen, I just haven't had time yet).

Anyway, I fixed that.  But now you really do need to rebase :-)

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: fix for BUG #3720: wrong results at using ltree
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Declared but no defined functions